Visitors should be treated with respect and courtesy by staff from the moment they arrive to when they depart. In prisons where systems of ‘self-governance’ or ‘shared governance’ with inmates operate, it is vital that families of detainees are not subject to actual or threatened violence or intimidation and are not asked to pay for obtain to family visits. In cases where family of a detainee live far away, for example, visits could be accumulated and then used over consecutive days for example, or allowing substitution of face-to-face visit time for telephone time. Detainees should never be placed far from their home for punitive or political reasons. Wherever possible, the preferences of the detainee should be taken into account in the decision. This issue may commonly arise for women prisoners given the low number of purpose-built women’s facilities. In some cases there may be competing considerations about placing prisoners in the closest facility on the one hand and the most appropriate facility for their classification on the other. It is unacceptable to demand payment or other actions from detainees or their families in return for visits.Īuthorities should generally seek to hold detainees at the most appropriate facility closest to where the detainee’s family is located. However, any such restriction must be justified in the circumstances, and visits should resume at the earliest possible time. In exceptional circumstances – for example, an emergency or natural disaster – it may be necessary to postpone or cancel a family visit. In the context of detention, this means that visits between detainees and their families should never be considered a privilege that can be taken away as a disciplinary measure. ![]() Print sectionįamily life is a fundamental human right. ![]() If the bonds between detainees and their families can be sustained throughout incarceration, the chances of successful reintegration into society are much greater. The majority of those in detention will at some stage be released into the community. There are many elements that must be considered – for example, material conditions for visits, and consideration for detainees with particular needs or in a situation of vulnerability. The family will keep track of where their loved ones are detained and look out for their general rights, interests and wellbeing.įamily visits are a right and not a privilege, and upholding the right to family is more than just about allowing the act of visits to occur. Contact with family whilst in detention represents a link between the detainee and the outside world and can often serve as a safeguard. Family members can play a vital emotional and material support role to detainees in difficult times. When someone is deprived of his or her liberty, family connections often take on a heightened importance. Cronologia da prevenção da tortura no Brasil.Safeguarding against risk of torture in Thailand.Rwanda: supporting the establishment of oversight body.Digital Mapping on Justice and Deprivation of Liberty in Latin America and the Caribbean.Developing Guidelines on non-coercive Interviewing and Safeguards. ![]() Preventing torture – From an idea to a global reality.Guidance: Monitoring Places of Detention through the COVID-19 Pandemic.The OPCAT: torture prevention in practice.The European Committee for Prevention of Torture (CPT).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |